Nuclear Risk

Smarter US modernization, without new nuclear weapons

By Andrew Weber, Christine Parthemore, January 2, 2019

The current US nuclear modernization program departs in several major ways from longstanding US nuclear policy: It elevates the role of nuclear weapons in US national security strategy, includes plans for developing several new nuclear weapon capabilities, and resurrects former nuclear capabilities that past US presidents had wisely eliminated. Of all the Trump administration’s nuclear modernization plans, however, the most destabilizing are probably the new, low-yield nuclear options and dual-capable systems that may be ambiguously nuclear or conventional. But the United States can still return to a smarter path – one that eliminates these specific nuclear weapons plans, and adopts a more measured nuclear rhetoric to match.

Read More: Smarter US modernization, without new nuclear weapons

As the coronavirus crisis shows, we need science now more than ever.

The Bulletin elevates expert voices above the noise. But as an independent, nonprofit media organization, our operations depend on the support of readers like you. Help us continue to deliver quality journalism that holds leaders accountable. Your support of our work at any level is important. In return, we promise our coverage will be understandable, influential, vigilant, solution-oriented, and fair-minded. Together we can make a difference.

Support the Bulletin

View Comments

  • There is always mention of the destabilizing effect of present or future US dual capable systems. Virtually all of Russia major weapon systems are dual capable. All their anti-ship missiles, their long range cruise missiles, their tactical missiles, torpedoes, depth charges, many of their surface to air missiles and all the hypersonic weapons they have deployed or are developing are dual capable. They are constantly reminding everyone of that fact, in other words they lead the world in dual capable systems. It seems though any dual capable system we might have is provocative. It sounds as if Russia has again infiltrated the arms control community.
    The whole argument is specious. There have been dual capable systems since the dawn of the nuclear age. Fighters, bombers even artillery have been dual capable and certainly cruise missiles.