Can the nuclear nonproliferation regime be saved when arms control is collapsing?

By John Mecklin | March 9, 2020

The United States’ withdrawal from the landmark Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, its backing away from the Iran nuclear deal, and the impending lapse of New START – the treaty that limits US and Russian deployed strategic nuclear weapons – would indeed be worrisome enough, even considered in isolation from one another. Taken together, this broad erosion of the world’s infrastructure for controlling nuclear weapons arsenals was a major factor in the Bulletin’s decision to move the hands of its Doomsday Clock to 100 seconds from midnight – closer to the apocalypse than they have ever been.

In this issue, we focus on another endangered pillar of the world’s nuclear threat-management regime: the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, or NPT. Free-access until May 1, 2020.

As the Russian invasion of Ukraine shows, nuclear threats are real, present, and dangerous

The Bulletin elevates expert voices above the noise. But as an independent, nonprofit media organization, our operations depend on the support of readers like you. Help us continue to deliver quality journalism that holds leaders accountable. Your support of our work at any level is important. In return, we promise our coverage will be understandable, influential, vigilant, solution-oriented, and fair-minded. Together we can make a difference.


Get alerts about this thread
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments