Nuclear Risk

Trump wants to initiate denuclearization talks with Russia and China

By Erik English, February 14, 2025

Trump wants to initiate denuclearization talks with Russia and China

By Erik English | February 14, 2025

On Thursday, President Donald Trump signaled that he wants to engage with Russia and China on denuclearization efforts. “There’s no reason for us to be building brand new nuclear weapons. We already have so many,” Trump said from the White House. “You could destroy the world 50 times over, 100 times over. And here we are building new nuclear weapons, and they’re building nuclear weapons, and China’s building nuclear weapons.” The number of nuclear weapons the United States and Russia can have is established by New START, which expires in 2026. Without a new agreement, nuclear states could begin to build up their arsenals for the first time since the Cold War. “Hopefully, there’ll never be a time when we need those weapons,” Trump said. “That’s going to be a very sad day, that’s going to be probably oblivion.”

Together, we make the world safer.

The Bulletin elevates expert voices above the noise. But as an independent nonprofit organization, our operations depend on the support of readers like you. Help us continue to deliver quality journalism that holds leaders accountable. Your support of our work at any level is important. In return, we promise our coverage will be understandable, influential, vigilant, solution-oriented, and fair-minded. Together we can make a difference.

Make your gift now Keywords: denuclearization
Topics: Nuclear Risk

Get alerts about this thread
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Erik English

Erik English is an associate multimedia editor at the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. He has worked at the International Atomic Energy... Read More

How Trump, Musk, and DOGE are undermining US intelligence and national security

By Thomas Fingar

Trump can’t denuclearize North Korea. South Korea’s next leader should pursue risk reduction instead

By Daeyeon Lee

The fires of Hiroshima and Los Angeles: Apocalypse redux

By Richard P. Turco, Owen Brian Toon

How the Trump administration could end a century of American scientific dominance

By Adam Sobel

Tulsi Gabbard as US intelligence chief would undermine efforts against the spread of chemical and biological weapons

By Gregory D. Koblentz

A former EPA assistant administrator on US environmental policy in the age of Musk and Trump

By Jessica McKenzie

RELATED POSTS

How Trump, Musk, and DOGE are undermining US intelligence and national security

By Thomas Fingar

Trump can’t denuclearize North Korea. South Korea’s next leader should pursue risk reduction instead

By Daeyeon Lee

The fires of Hiroshima and Los Angeles: Apocalypse redux

By Richard P. Turco, Owen Brian Toon

How the Trump administration could end a century of American scientific dominance

By Adam Sobel

Tulsi Gabbard as US intelligence chief would undermine efforts against the spread of chemical and biological weapons

By Gregory D. Koblentz

A former EPA assistant administrator on US environmental policy in the age of Musk and Trump

By Jessica McKenzie

Receive Email
Updates

Subscribe

Bulletin Daily

How Trump, Musk, and DOGE are undermining US intelligence and national security

By Thomas Fingar

Trump can’t denuclearize North Korea. South Korea’s next leader should pursue risk reduction instead

By Daeyeon Lee

The fires of Hiroshima and Los Angeles: Apocalypse redux

By Richard P. Turco, Owen Brian Toon

How the Trump administration could end a century of American scientific dominance

By Adam Sobel

Tulsi Gabbard as US intelligence chief would undermine efforts against the spread of chemical and biological weapons

By Gregory D. Koblentz

A former EPA assistant administrator on US environmental policy in the age of Musk and Trump

By Jessica McKenzie

An appreciation: How physicist Evgeny Velikhov helped end the US-Soviet nuclear arms race

By Frank von Hippel, Thomas B. Cochran, Richard L. Garwin, Roald Sagdeev

What should a new deal with Iran look like?

By Oren Setter, Itamar Lifshitz

As the coronavirus crisis shows, we need science now more than ever.

The Bulletin elevates expert voices above the noise. But as an independent, nonprofit media organization, our operations depend on the support of readers like you. Help us continue to deliver quality journalism that holds leaders accountable. Your support of our work at any level is important. In return, we promise our coverage will be understandable, influential, vigilant, solution-oriented, and fair-minded. Together we can make a difference.

Support the Bulletin