A sampling of what's available...

US nuclear forces, 2013

By Hans M. Kristensen, Robert S. Norris
Prev 1 of 2 Next

Fissile Materials Working Group

How do you solve a problem like plutonium?

A five-point plan for making the world safer.

Nonproliferation in a time of austerity

Tighter budgets don't mean nonproliferation efforts have to be scaled back. They just have to become more innovative.

How to safeguard loose nukes

The Obama administration must do more to stop nuclear materials from falling into the wrong hands.

A threat that demands action

Nuclear terrorism, which could unravel societies and kill hundreds of thousands, is a real and disconcerting possibility. In his second term, President Obama must take concrete steps to ensure global nuclear security.

Uncooperative threat reduction

Russian leaders have indicated the Cooperative Threat Reduction agreement is in jeopardy -- putting global fissile security and years of diplomacy at risk.

Revisiting radioactive source security

A top-down approach to radioactive materials security is one way -- but certainly not the only way -- to prevent a terrorist attack.

Security at Y-12 nun too good

The Energy Department released its investigation into an activist break-in at the Y-12 nuclear facility, detailing appalling security failures that may finally get the attention of Congress.

The oversight imperative

Most experts agree that international oversight of nuclear security is inadequate. The International Atomic Energy Agency possesses the potential to address this problem for the global community. Here's how it can be done.

Australia's nuclear dilemma

Australia is ranked No. 1 in nuclear safety and security, it has proposed fresh ideas to ensure nuclear security tops the global agenda, and it is hosting a regional nuclear summit to keep dialogue alive. But can Australia be a leader in nuclear security while it continues to sell uranium to India?

Nuclear security's top priority

The 2012 security summit in Seoul made progress toward eliminating HEU stocks but did not alter the security trajectory in Russia or Pakistan. Nuclear stocks continue to be a threat -- and the international community must design a lasting architecture of cooperation to ensure a safer planet.

Could less be more?

The 2012 Nuclear Security Summit made some progress, but barriers to reform are ingrained. Luckily, there are still steps global leaders can take to ensure nuclear security past 2014.

Seoul purpose

With states around the globe honoring commitments made at the 2010 Nuclear Security Summit, the forum has proved very effective. What needs to be done in Seoul to ensure further success in securing vulnerable nuclear materials -- and what needs to be done thereafter?

Why Latin America matters at the Nuclear Security Summit

Nuclear security is an issue for all nations, not just those with weapons-grade materials. A Latin American perspective on nuclear security, nonproliferation, and disarmament.

Involuntary response

The second Nuclear Security Summit needs a real plan to secure nuclear materials worldwide -- rather than relying on voluntary efforts and nonbinding, unchecked agreements.

Radiological materials and the Nuclear Security Summit

Many fear expanding the 2012 summit agenda to include radiological security will dilute its nuclear focus. But dangerous radioactive materials -- often far less secure and far more accessible than nuclear materials -- need all the attention they can get.

Why the Conference on Disarmament still matters

Reconciling interests in the CD may be a frustrating exercise, but it is necessary if we are to design enforceable global nonproliferation and disarmament treaties.

Libya, Belarus, and dealing with dictators

Recent events have shown that working with mercurial dictators is still a lot safer than ignoring them.

Two treaties. One Congress. No time to wait.

Congress has a chance to take real steps to reduce the risks of nuclear terrorism -- if only they would act.

Prev 1 of 2 Next

Profile

Fissile Materials Working Group

The Fissile Materials Working Group (FMWG) brings together the experience of leading nonproliferation experts and nongovernmental organizations to support President Barack Obama's vision of "securing all nuclear weapon materials at vulnerable sites within four years." Specifically, working group members collaborate in a series of meetings to create consensus around fissile material control priorities, develop actionable policy proposals, and package recommendations for implementation by Obama administration officials. FMWG members who will contribute to this column include Irma Arguello, David Culp, Ingrid Drake, Rob Golan-Vilella, Li Hong, Kenneth Luongo, Michelle Cann, Rajiv Nayan, Miles Pomper, William Potter, Kingston Reif, Jennifer Smyser, Elena Sokova, Peter Stockton, Alexandra Toma, Paul Walker, Peter Wilk, and Sarah Williams.

Columnist Resources

Recent Work

Recommended Links