The 2012 Nuclear Security Summit made some progress, but barriers to reform are ingrained. Luckily, there are still steps global leaders can take to ensure nuclear security past 2014.
With states around the globe honoring commitments made at the 2010 Nuclear Security Summit, the forum has proved very effective. What needs to be done in Seoul to ensure further success in securing vulnerable nuclear materials -- and what needs to be done thereafter?
Nuclear security is an issue for all nations, not just those with weapons-grade materials. A Latin American perspective on nuclear security, nonproliferation, and disarmament.
The second Nuclear Security Summit needs a real plan to secure nuclear materials worldwide -- rather than relying on voluntary efforts and nonbinding, unchecked agreements.
Many fear expanding the 2012 summit agenda to include radiological security will dilute its nuclear focus. But dangerous radioactive materials -- often far less secure and far more accessible than nuclear materials -- need all the attention they can get.
Reconciling interests in the CD may be a frustrating exercise, but it is necessary if we are to design enforceable global nonproliferation and disarmament treaties.
Recent events have shown that working with mercurial dictators is still a lot safer than ignoring them.
Congress has a chance to take real steps to reduce the risks of nuclear terrorism -- if only they would act.
It is time for the nuclear security structure to be reconceptualized to emphasize consensus, efficiency, and the reality of global nuclear threats to all nations.
A behind-the-scenes look at one of the largest nuclear systems in the world.
A truly collaborative international approach is essential to improving nuclear security worldwide and reducing the threat of nuclear terrorism.
Osama bin Laden is gone, but the threat of nuclear terrorism remains. To improve security, the United States must support efforts to eliminate and secure nuclear materials worldwide.
Last year 47 nations gathered in Washington, DC, to support improvements in international security. Their promises were not empty. One year later, these countries have made significant progress toward improving the security of vulnerable nuclear material around the world.
If authorized funding is not appropriated for 2011 in the upcoming funding bill, efforts to improve global nuclear material security will stall and the Global Threat Reduction Initiative will be the biggest loser.
G-8 leaders' failure to renew WMD program puts the world at risk.
The U.S. is the linchpin in international security efforts, and key nuclear security programs need strong congressional support.
Such an agenda doesn't require that international law be rewritten, it merely needs to make sure that the existing legal structures are adhered to more stringently.
President Obama's spending requests to fulfill his promise of securing all of the world's vulnerable nuclear material within the next four years haven't been nearly as ambitious as his rhetoric.