By Dawn Stover | November 3, 2016
Neither of the presidential candidates is doing a great job of focusing on the biggest threats to the world, according to a group of experts surveyed by the Associated Press. The risk experts who agreed to rate the two candidates gave Hillary Clinton an average grade of C-plus, and Donald Trump an F.
One reason Clinton scored better than Trump is because she has a plan to deal with the number one threat identified by the 21 experts: climate change. The other four biggest threats, the risk experts said, are nuclear weapons, pandemics, cyberattacks, and problems with high technology. (It's no coincidence that those are the core topics the Bulletin covers regularly.)
"Political campaigns often miss the real potential risks while exaggering others, especially immigration and terrorism," the risk experts said. Over the past 15 years, people living in the United States were more than twice as likely to die in an extreme weather event than in a terrorist attack.
The Bulletin elevates expert voices above the noise. But as an independent, nonprofit media organization, our operations depend on the support of readers like you. Help us continue to deliver quality journalism that holds leaders accountable. Your support of our work at any level is important. In return, we promise our coverage will be understandable, influential, vigilant, solution-oriented, and fair-minded. Together we can make a difference.