Banking on military models to combat cyber threats

By Thomas Gaulkin | May 22, 2018


“Sheltered Harbor.” “Quantum Dawn.” You might mistake these for names of Bond movies or military operations, and you wouldn’t be far off.

Writing in The New York Times, Stacy Cowley details steps taken by banking industry heavyweights like Mastercard, Citigroup, and Wells Fargo to coordinate their defense against cyber attacks like the Equifax breach that exposed 146 million people’s information last year. As companies become increasingly paranoid about the vulnerability of their systems, Cowley reports they are increasingly willing to do whatever it takes to protect them. Cybersecurity is “the only place in the company that doesn’t have a budget constraint,” says Bank of America CEO Brian T. Moynihan.

Following the model of  “fusion centers” created after 9/11 by the Department of Homeland Security to coordinate federal and local agencies’ intelligence, the banks are cooperating to streamline how they track and recover from major hacks. Several have hired special forces veterans and CIA operatives, and prepare with combat drills like the aforementioned Quantum Dawn: “a biennial simulation of a catastrophic cyberstrike” that runs on a test “cyber range” designed by a Department of Defense contractor.

Cowley describes “war rooms” like the set of “Dr. Strangelove” or “WarGames,” with giant screens and animated world maps that seem designed mostly to impress deep-pocket customers. “You can’t have a fusion center unless you have really cool TVs,” says Citigroup’s cybersecurity chief.

But the threat is real, despite these dramatics. Mastercard alone has tracked 20 million intrusion attempts since January. Hacking programs are only becoming more sophisticated, including those apparently sponsored by countries like North Korea and Russia, and their effects are cause for concern well beyond individual privacy. If banks’ military readiness is part of a new cyber arms race, Thomas Jefferson’s statement that “banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies” may take on a different shade.

Publication Name: The New York Times
To read what we're reading, click here

Together, we make the world safer.

The Bulletin elevates expert voices above the noise. But as an independent nonprofit organization, our operations depend on the support of readers like you. Help us continue to deliver quality journalism that holds leaders accountable. Your support of our work at any level is important. In return, we promise our coverage will be understandable, influential, vigilant, solution-oriented, and fair-minded. Together we can make a difference.

Get alerts about this thread
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments