Anti-satellite warfare and the case for an alternative draft treaty for space security

By Daniel Porras, June 27, 2019

On 27 March 2019, the Indian Government destroyed one of its own satellites with a missile interceptor, reminding the world that States consider “counterspace capabilities” to be an essential part of a modern military and are actively developing such weapons. Some of these capabilities, however, are highly destructive and can pose a threat to other objects in orbit through the creation of space debris. As space grows in importance for the military and the rest of society, it is becoming increasingly necessary to better define the limits of conflict, even in the space environment. One option for ensuring the long-term sustainability of space activities is a two-step approach: the development and adoption of “anti-satellite test” guidelines, followed by the negotiation of a treaty on the prohibition of the destruction of objects in orbit.

RELATED:
RELATED: Pandemic failure or convenient scapegoat: How did WHO get here?

A two-step approach toward space arms control: the development and adoption of “anti-satellite test” guidelines, followed by a treaty on prohibiting destruction of orbiting objects.

As the coronavirus crisis shows, we need science now more than ever.

The Bulletin elevates expert voices above the noise. But as an independent, nonprofit media organization, our operations depend on the support of readers like you. Help us continue to deliver quality journalism that holds leaders accountable. Your support of our work at any level is important. In return, we promise our coverage will be understandable, influential, vigilant, solution-oriented, and fair-minded. Together we can make a difference.

Share: 

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of

ALSO IN THIS ISSUE

RELATED POSTS

Receive Email
Updates