By Thomas Gaulkin | February 11, 2020
Introducing the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists special issue on nuclear weapons policy and the US presidential election, editor in chief John Mecklin wrote: “When it comes to the major American media covering the US presidential election campaign, discussion of nuclear policy seldom happens, and when it does break out, the level of intelligence and sophistication involved is often, to put it politely, wanting.”
But some intrepid buttonholing by the Union of the Concerned Scientists helps fill in where TV debate moderators fear to tread—asking candidates about the US president’s sole authority to launch nuclear weapons, and whether the United States should ever strike with nukes first. The Democratic frontrunners agree, for the most part, but it’s useful to hear how, and also where they differ. You’ll rarely hear it anywhere else.
The Bulletin elevates expert voices above the noise. But as an independent, nonprofit media organization, our operations depend on the support of readers like you. Help us continue to deliver quality journalism that holds leaders accountable. Your support of our work at any level is important. In return, we promise our coverage will be understandable, influential, vigilant, solution-oriented, and fair-minded. Together we can make a difference.
Keywords: 2020 election, no first use, nuclear strategy
Topics: Multimedia, Nuclear Risk, Nuclear Weapons