• Home
  • Magazine
  • Archive
  • Subscribe
  • Events
  • Store
  • Advertise
  • My Account
  • Login
  • Giving
Giving logo footer
logo footer
  • Doomsday Clock
  • Nuclear Risk
  • Climate Change
  • Disruptive Technologies
  • Biosecurity
  • Support Our Work
A clock reading 90 seconds to midnight
A clock reading 90 seconds to midnight
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, with a clock reading 90 seconds to midnight
MENUMENU
  • Doomsday Clock
  • Magazine
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Featured Topics
    • Doomsday Clock
    • Nuclear Risk
    • Climate Change
    • Disruptive Technologies
    • Biosecurity
  • Other Topics
    • Magazine
    • Magazine Covers
    • Login
    • Subscribe
    • Events
    • Next Generation
    • Multimedia
    • Pathogens Project
    • Arts Science Initiative
    • Nuclear Notebook
    • Virtual Tour
  • Store
  • Support
    • Ways to Give
    • Annual Fund
    • Annual Event
    • Planned Gifts
    • Donor Recognitition
    • Special Inititatives
    • Give Now
    • Store
  • About Us
    • Our Mission
    • Leadership
    • Staff
    • Columnists
    • Annual Report
    • Permissions & copyright
    • Media Inquiries
    • Editorial Independence
    • Advertise
    • Open Positions
    • Contact Us
  • Stay Connected
    • Newsletter
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • YouTube

Join Christopher Nolan at Conversations Before Midnight

Manhattan Project

Widening the field of view on ‘Oppenheimer’

By Robert J. Goldston | Nuclear Weapons

Nolan’s ‘Oppenheimer’: an artistic visual tapestry of the bomb’s science and power intricacies

By Lovely Umayam | Nuclear Weapons

What ‘Oppenheimer’ can teach today’s scientists

By Charles D. Ferguson | Nuclear Weapons

‘Oppenheimer’ depicts a man becoming powerful—and irrelevant

By Laura Grego | Nuclear Weapons

Nuclear weapons since Oppenheimer: Who’s in control?

By Lisbeth Gronlund | Nuclear Weapons

‘Oppenheimer’, the bomb, and arms control, then and now

By Daryl G. Kimball | Nuclear Weapons

Physicists and other experts react to ‘Oppenheimer’

By François Diaz-Maurin | Nuclear Weapons

‘Oppenheimer’ is terrific. But it’s just a movie

By Stewart Prager | Nuclear Weapons

Oppenheimer’s vision for arms control is still upon us

By Andrew Facini | Nuclear Weapons

A Manhattan Project historian comments on ‘Oppenheimer’

By Chris Griffith | Nuclear Weapons

Thought-provoked by ‘Oppenheimer’

By Victor Gilinsky | Nuclear Weapons

The explosive musical score to Oppenheimer

By Reba A. Wissner | Nuclear Weapons, Opinion

123

Don't Miss An Update

Subscribe to Receive Email Updates
  • Doomsday Clock
  • Doomsday Clock Statement
  • FAQ
  • Timeline
  • Know the Time
  • Doomsday Dashboard
  • Doomsday Clock Playlist
  • Past Statements
  • Featured Topics
  • Nuclear Risk
  • Climate Change
  • Disruptive Technologies
  • Other Topics
  • Events
  • Current Magazine Issue
  • Magazine Covers
  • Next Generation
  • Multimedia
  • Pathogens Project
  • Arts Science Initiative
  • Nuclear Notebook
  • Virtual Tour
  • Support
  • Ways to Give
  • Annual Fund
  • Annual Event
  • Planned Gifts
  • Donor Recognition
  • Special Initiatives
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Our Mission
  • Leadership
  • Staff
  • Columnists
  • Annual Report
  • What’s New at the Bulletin
  • Editorial Independence Policy
  • Open Positions
  • Contact Us
  • Send us a Tip
  • Write for Us
  • Permissions & copyrights
  • Media Inquiries
  • Support Us
  • Advertise
  • Email Us
  • Stay Connected
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Get Our Newsletter
  • My Account

Copyright © 2023 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. All rights reserved. Terms of UsePrivacy Policy

1307 East 60th Street, Chicago, IL 60637 | 773.702.6308