The authoritative guide to ensuring science and technology make life on Earth better, not worse.

On the 20th anniversary of the 1998 nuclear tests by India and Pakistan

By Zia Mian, M.V. Ramana | June 1, 2018

Screen Shot 2018-05-31 at 5.05.31 PM.png

May 2018 marked the 20th anniversary of the nuclear weapon tests by India and Pakistan. Over these past two decades, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists has covered the growing nuclear programs of the two countries and the profound risks they pose to the roughly 1.5 billion people now living in these two countries, who make up one-fifth of humanity. Here, guest editors Zia Mian and M.V. Ramana select a few of the many articles on nuclear South Asia that have been published by the Bulletin.

On 11 May 1998, Indian Prime Minister A.B. Vajpayee announced that three nuclear devices had been exploded earlier that day. Two days later, following two more explosions, Vajpayee proudly announced that India was now a nuclear weapon state. A couple of weeks later, on May 28 and 30, Pakistan’s Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif announced that his country had conducted six nuclear explosions.

Although the 1998 tests by India surprised much of the world, readers of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists had been forewarned. In 1996, one of us (ZM) had written that if the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) were to come to power, India might test a thermonuclear weapon, and that Pakistan would welcome the opportunity this might create to test its own nuclear weapons.

The potential use of nuclear weapons has shadowed all military conflicts in the subcontinent since the nuclear tests of 1998. During the conflict over the Kargil region of Kashmir in 1999, the third war over Kashmir, Indian and Pakistani officials delivered indirect and direct nuclear threats at least 13 times. The Bulletin has carried articles that describe the potential impact of nuclear weapon use in South Asia as well as the various technological aspirations and acquisitions of the two countries. These include tactical nuclear weapons for use in the battlefield and ballistic missile defense systems. There also have been articles on Pakistan’s proliferation of nuclear technology, and on the risks from Islamic militant movements.

The Bulletin’s Nuclear Notebook column has tracked the nuclear arsenals of India and Pakistan. For example, in 2002, a Nuclear Notebook column listed just five types of delivery vehicles for India, two aircraft and three short- or medium-range ballistic missiles. In contrast, besides the two aircraft and the three short or medium range missiles, the 2017 update lists at least six separate land-ballistic missiles or sea-based missiles.

The future of nuclear South Asia looks bleak. In 20 years, despite crisis, war, and spiraling nuclear and conventional military forces, the two countries have failed to agree any significant measures to restrain their rivalry. The next round involves both countries putting nuclear weapons at sea. Meanwhile, broad-based peace movements have failed to take hold. The international community, for its part, has moved on to other concerns, until the next crisis.

1996: A time of testing?

India seemed to be preparing the ground for a nuclear test. Pakistan seemed not very concerned.

Zia Mian and A. H. Nayyar

 

1998: A very political bomb

For the BJP, nuclear weapons are essential to a powerful, awe-inspiring, and militarist “Hindu India”

Praful Bidwai and Achin Vanaik

 

Pakistan’s nuclear forces, 2001

Outside experts estimate the country has between 24 and 48 nuclear weapons

Robert S. Norris, William M. Arkin, Hans M. Kristensen, and Joshua Handler

 

India’s nuclear forces, 2002

From various sources, we estimate that India has a stockpile of 30-35 nuclear warheads, which it is thought to be expanding.

Robert S. Norris, William M. Arkin, Hans M. Kristensen, and Joshua Handler

 

2002: India’s ambitions

Analysis of two important books on India’s emerging nuclear capabilities

George Perkovich

 

2003: A bomb for the Ummah

Some of Pakistan’s nuclear scientists believe that the bomb should be shared with all of the Muslim community, even—or especially—with Al Qaeda

David Albright and Holly Higgins

 

2004: Pakistan: It’s déjà vu all over again

Pakistan lied, stole, and conned its way to becoming a nuclear weapons power. Now it’s doing the same as a nuclear broker. Will the United States do anything about it?

Leonard Weiss

 

2011: Fatwas for fission: Assessing the terrorist threat to Pakistan’s nuclear assets

Pakistan’s nuclear assets may be tempting targets for terrorists. Experts are split, however, on the actual threat posed.

Charles P. Blair

 

2012: No first use: The way to contain nuclear war in South Asia

A US-led effort to engage the major nuclear powers in bilateral or multilateral no-first-use pledges would decrease the likelihood that a conflict between India and Pakistan could spin out of control

Lawrence J. Korb, Alexander Rothman

 

2013: Scientists and an atomic subcontinent

The facts of the nuclear situation in Pakistan and India are, without exaggeration, frightening, in and beyond the subcontinent.

Pervez Hoodbhoy

 

2014: Battlefield weapons and missile defense: Worrisome developments in nuclear South Asia

Two recent developments in South Asia have increased the risk of an accelerated arms race between India and Pakistan

R. Rajaraman

 

2016: Self-assured destruction: The climate impacts of nuclear war

Even a “small” nuclear war between India and Pakistan, with each country detonating 50 Hiroshima-size atom bombs as air bursts in urban areas, could produce so much smoke that temperatures would fall below those of the Little Ice Age of the fourteenth to nineteenth centuries, shortening the growing season around the world and threatening the global food supply

Alan Robock and Owen Brian Toon

 

2016: A warning about Pakistan’s illusion of power

Free discussion and honest opinion about nuclear weapons have been nearly prohibited in Pakistan, under the premise that any such talk poses a basic threat to national security

I.A. Rehman

 

2016: Taking stock: The US-India nuclear deal 10 years later

The deal has vastly improved US-India trade and defense cooperation but has also aggravated tensions between India and Pakistan and a nuclear arms race between the two countries.

Subrata Ghoshroy

 

2016: Kashmir, climate change and nuclear war

A new source of conflict between Pakistan and India has emerged. It is a struggle over access to and control over the water in the rivers that start as snow and glacial meltwater in the Himalayas and pass through Kashmir on their way to Pakistan as the Indus River Basin.

Zia Mian

 

Pakistani nuclear forces, 2016

Pakistan has a nuclear weapons stockpile of 130–140 warheads and appears to have plans to increase its arsenal further

Hans M. Kristensen and Robert S. Norris

 

Indian nuclear forces, 2017

India is estimated to have produced enough plutonium for 150–200 nuclear warheads but has likely produced only 120–130

Hans M. Kristensen and Robert S. Norris


Together, we make the world safer.

The Bulletin elevates expert voices above the noise. But as an independent nonprofit organization, our operations depend on the support of readers like you. Help us continue to deliver quality journalism that holds leaders accountable. Your support of our work at any level is important. In return, we promise our coverage will be understandable, influential, vigilant, solution-oriented, and fair-minded. Together we can make a difference.


Topics: Uncategorized

Get alerts about this thread
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Text reads, “Give the gift of Bulletin swag. Shop merch designed to raise awareness about nuclear risk, climate change, and disruptive technologies.” Below it is a button that says “Show now.” A man appears wearing a Bulletin T-shirt and smiling.

RELATED POSTS

Receive Email
Updates