A double-flash from the past and Israel’s nuclear arsenal

By Leonard Weiss, August 3, 2018

Approximate location of the double-flash observed by a US satellite in 1979.

For more than half a century, Israel has maintained a cover of silence and opacity regarding its nuclear program and arsenal, backed up by the threat of severe punishment and persecution for any Israeli (see Mordechai Vanunu) who dares publicly breach the cover. In return for this silence, plus a pledge of restraint on certain nuclear development activities, the United States has reportedly agreed in writing not to pressure Israel to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty or get rid of its nuclear arsenal. (See this recent New Yorker article by Adam Entous.) US policy on Israel also includes its own public silence concerning Israeli nuclear weapons. But this policy should change as a result of a new scientific study of an event that took place nearly 40 years ago, during the Carter Administration. That study makes it virtually certain that the event was an illegal nuclear test. This strengthens previous analyses concluding that Israel likely carried out a nuclear test in violation of US law and the Limited Test Ban Treaty. The response to this new study will determine whether the United States and the international community of nations are serious about nuclear arms control.

On September 22, 1979, a US Vela satellite, designed to detect clandestine nuclear tests, recorded a “flash” off the coast of South Africa that every nuclear scientist monitoring the satellite’s detectors at the time believed fit the classic description of a nuclear explosion. President Jimmy Carter’s book based on his White House diaries notes that he was immediately informed of the “flash” by his national security team; with the information came speculation that the event was an Israeli nuclear test at sea, with South African participation. Corroborative data from different sources was immediately sought and analyzed, but much of that data and analysis has remained classified to date (nearly 40 years later), despite attempts to get the government to remove the classification. Independent scientific studies of the event have reinforced the growing circumstantial evidence that the Vela event was an atmospheric nuclear test, and that Israel was the perpetrator, with possible assistance from apartheid South Africa’s navy. The US government’s position, held to this day, was to neither admit nor deny that a test took place. A panel of scientists carefully selected by the Carter White House produced a report in 1980 that did not rule out a test, but said the probability of its being something other than a test was more likely. That conclusion is now derided by nearly all independent observers who have studied and reported on the issue.

Important new and dispositive evidence that the “flash” was a nuclear test has been added recently by two respected scientists, Christopher Wright of the Australian Defense Force Academy and Lars-Eric De Geer of the Swedish Defense Research Agency (Ret.), writing in the journal Science & Global Security. (The 22 September 1979 Vela Incident: The Detected Double-Flash, Science & Global Security, 25:3, 95-124, DOI: 10.1080/08929882.2017.1394047)

Using data first gathered by Distinguished Professor Lester VanMiddlesworth of the University of Tennessee on radioactivity found in the thyroids of sheep in Australia within the time period following the “flash,” plus meteorological data from the time and some radionuclide and hydro-acoustic data released by the US government, Wright and De Geer have produced an analysis of the Vela event that removes virtually all doubt that the “flash” was a nuclear explosion. The explosion was one of small yield, perhaps to simulate the result of firing a nuclear artillery shell. Wright and De Geer do not speculate on who might have performed the test. But none of the five recognized nuclear weapon states would feel the need to perform a small clandestine test of that kind. Similarly, in 1979, neither India nor Pakistan nor South Africa had nuclear development and logistics capabilities at a stage where a nuclear test of that kind in that area was feasible for them. Israel was the only country that had the technical ability and policy motivation to carry out such a clandestine test, which, according to some sources, was the last of several and was detected by the Vela satellite because of a sudden change in cloud cover.

The new study by Wright and De Geer should receive wide attention because it provides a test of the commitment by the international community to nuclear arms control and nonproliferation norms. While a comprehensive nuclear test ban is yet to be achieved, the nations of the world did manage to put in place an extremely important arms control, non-proliferation, and environmental protection measure called The Limited Test Ban Treaty (LTBT). This treaty, which went into force in 1963, bans nuclear explosions in the atmosphere, in outer space, and under water, thus rendering legal only those nuclear tests performed underground. Israel signed the treaty in 1963 and ratified it in 1964. The Israeli nuclear test puts Israel in violation of the LTBT, which has been signed by 108 countries, including all the officially recognized nuclear weapon states plus India, Pakistan, and Iran. Israel would also be in violation of the Glenn Amendment to the Arms Export Control Act, a US law passed in 1977, requiring the cutoff of military assistance to any country setting off a nuclear explosion. The president can waive the sanction, but he has to face the issue.

In the meantime, what should be a consequence of the flagrant violation of the Limited Test Ban Treaty?

At a time when public demands for nuclear transparency are loudly and justifiably trumpeted toward Iran and North Korea, which are pariahs in many Western eyes, it is illogical at best and hypocritical at worst for the world, and particularly the United States, to maintain public silence on Israel’s nuclear program, especially in the face of a violation of an important nuclear norm. For the sake of future progress on arms control, on steps to reduce nuclear risk, and on honest public as well as private communication among governments and their constituents to achieve such progress, it is time to end an existing double standard that has allowed Israel to escape accountability for developing advanced nuclear weapons by violating a major international treaty.

 


Share: 

10
Leave a Reply

avatar
6 Comment threads
4 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
8 Comment authors
Jenny Agutter fanJoshua HellmannIrrefutable Ev.JustEdPeter Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Gary
Guest
Gary

Israel doesnt threaten anyone.north Korea and iran do.israel will never give up their nuclear weapons as it is suicide .the world is anti semitic more now than any other time other than hitler.it would be madness to give it up as they take serious the threats from iran that it is good that so many jews live in a small country so they can massacre them.They will always remember the holocaust when the world turned against them and they were powerless.

Jenny Agutter fan
Guest
Jenny Agutter fan

It’s probably worth noting that Israel’s staunchest allies in the US are the likes of Pat Robertson and John Hagee (and the late Jerry Falwell). Read the vile things that those creeps said about Jews.

And Israel’s leading critics? Noam Chomsky, George Soros, Bernie Sanders, Amy Goodman and Sarah Silverman, all of them Jews.

Eileen Fleming
Guest

During this American’s first of 8 trips to Jerusalem beginning in 2005, a serendipitous meeting with Mordechai Vanunu led to a series of interviews and the realization of my childhood dream of being a reporter when Vanunu tells me: “In 1955, Perez and Guirion met with the French to agree they would get a nuclear reactor if they fought against Egypt to control the Sinai and Suez Canal. That was the war of 1956. Eisenhower demanded that Israel leave the Sinai, but the reactor plant deal continued on. “Did you know that President Kennedy tried to stop Israel from building… Read more »

Michael Love
Guest
Michael Love

Without any clear, absolute proof that Isreal performed the test, you couldn’t possibly do ANYTHING to them. Circumstantial evidence at best. Just more hatred aimed at Isreal. Find verifiable proof and we can be all over them.

Irrefutable Ev.
Guest

What? The grand total of evidence against Israel is as damning as the US/IL reactions to the truth are laughable.

Joshua Hellmann
Guest
Joshua Hellmann

Vela satellite measurements. Independent, peer-reviewed Scientific Papers. Logic and deductive reasoning. How much more proof do you need? Israel setting a nuke off in your backyard? Clearly you have a political motivation in rejecting the truth.

Peter
Guest
Peter

Of COURSE Israel did. Rogue nation. (ANY other nation doing what they do would be the target of concerted US sanctions.)

Jenny Agutter fan
Guest
Jenny Agutter fan

Hell, Israel got away with killing a US citizen (Rachel Corrie) and even US troops (the USS Liberty).

JustEd
Guest
JustEd

There is no justification for what is being done to Iran and North Korea.

Jenny Agutter fan
Guest
Jenny Agutter fan

Makes perfect sense that one apartheid state possessing weapons of mass destruction helped another develop them.

RELATED POSTS

Receive Email
Updates