Should Biden aim to cut US carbon emissions in half by 2030?

By Oliver Milman | March 16, 2021

Photo illustration by Gerd Altmann/Pixabay

Editor’s note: This story was originally published by The Guardian. It appears here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration.

The United States needs to commit to slashing its planet-heating emissions by at least half by the end of this decade to address the climate crisis and spur other countries to greater action, a coalition of American environmental groups has urged.

Joe Biden’s administration is set to unveil a new national emissions reduction target at a climate meeting it has convened with other major economic powers on Earth Day—April 22—which it hopes will galvanize countries that are currently dangerously lagging in efforts to stave off disastrous climate change.

A motley selection of environmental groups and leaders have said the US’ goal must be no lower than a 50-percent cut in its greenhouse gas emissions by 2030, based on 2005 levels. This will, the groups argue, put America on track to meet Biden’s aspiration of net zero emissions by 2050, as well as provide a major push to countries and businesses that were bereft of American climate leadership during Donald Trump’s presidency.

“The target has to be ambitious enough to show US leadership, but also credible. It can’t just be plucked from thin air,” said Nat Keohane, vice-president for international climate at the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF). “This is ambitious but also feasible. We need to show the United States is bringing everything it can to this fight.”

new EDF report calls for a “whole of government effort” to combat the climate crisis, with all cars sold in the United States to be zero emissions from 2035, a clean electricity standard to shift the grid to renewable energy sources such as solar and wind, and new regulations to restrict methane emissions from oil and gas drilling. Other environmental groups, including the Union of Concerned Scientists, the World Resources Institute, and the National Resources Defense Council, have also rallied to the idea of a 50 percent cut, along with figures such as Jay Inslee, the governor of Washington, and Michael Bloomberg, former mayor of New York City. They say such a figure is crucial to curb ever-worsening wildfires, floods, and heatwaves that are suffered disproportionately by underserved Americans of color.

Introduction: Bringing the world’s food production in line with global climate goals

“We see this as an important opportunity to bolster equity and fairness,” said Starla Yeh, a clean energy policy specialist at the Natural Resources Defense Council. “The goal is not only achievable but cost-effective. The more progress we make this decade, the better off we will be.”

The United States first set an emissions reduction target, known in diplomatic jargon as a nationally determined contribution (or NDC), in 2014 during Barack Obama’s administration, vowing to cut emissions by up to 28 percent of 2005 levels by the year 2025. That target by itself does not lower emissions but helps set federal government policy and provides a framework for businesses, cities, and states to work towards.

A 50-percent reduction by 2030 would “be a challenge,” according to Nathan Hultman, director at Center for Global Sustainability at the University of Maryland, who helped design the Obama-era goal, but would be achievable with a “whole-of-society approach.”

The international credibility of the world’s second-largest carbon polluter was severely damaged during the Trump administration, when the United States pulled out of the Paris climate agreement and dismantled various rules aimed to reduce emissions. The US’s return to the international fold has come with added expectations, with Laurence Tubiana, a French diplomat and key architect of the Paris Agreement, saying the American target should be “at least” a 50 percent reduction.

“There are broad expectations from America’s allies that the NDC needs to start with a ‘5’,” said Keohane. “There is a level of urgency you hear from folks in the White House that is a sea change from even the Obama administration. I think they are serious in putting out an ambitious marker.”

The underwater Amazon: Kelp forests are crucial to the fight against climate change. Here's how they could be saved.

John Kerry, Biden’s climate envoy, is currently on a trip to Europe to meet leaders in the lead-up to crucial UN climate talks in Glasgow later this year. Kerry met with the British prime minister, Boris Johnson, on Monday and will this week hold talks with officials from the European commission and the French government.

Kerry said the United Kingdom was a “strong partner” in facing the climate crisis but that the world’s largest emitters needed to do far more. Before his trip, Kerry had said the world was “marching forward to what is almost tantamount to a mutual suicide pact” by failing to cut emissions quickly enough. China, the world’s largest emitter, recently released a five-year plan that severely disappointed environmentalists.

Together, we make the world safer.

The Bulletin elevates expert voices above the noise. But as an independent nonprofit organization, our operations depend on the support of readers like you. Help us continue to deliver quality journalism that holds leaders accountable. Your support of our work at any level is important. In return, we promise our coverage will be understandable, influential, vigilant, solution-oriented, and fair-minded. Together we can make a difference.

Get alerts about this thread
Notify of

1 Comment
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dik Coates
3 years ago

Other than a handful of Middle Eastern countries, the carbon leaders are Australia, Canada, the US with 16.1 metric tons per capita. Canada dwarfs the US due to our size, travel distances, and climate. China is half the US output per capita at 8 metric tons per capita. Biden has to do better than to cut half for 2030. The US is putting the world at risk.


Receive Email