Burma nuclear program highlights the need for a standing UN technical body

By Robert Kelley | November 1, 2010

The author highlights Burma and recent events surrounding its nuclear program to
present a case for the development of a UN technical body to investigate
countries suspected of having weapons of mass destruction (WMD). International
verification organizations such as the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
and the Organization for the Prevention of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) have no
expertise in evaluating technologies outside their core missions, which, he
writes, means no international organization can assess the technology of missile
delivery systems. Using Burma as a backdrop, the author makes the case for an
international technical body, which he outlines in structure, function, and
scope.

As the coronavirus crisis shows, we need science now more than ever.

The Bulletin elevates expert voices above the noise. But as an independent, nonprofit media organization, our operations depend on the support of readers like you. Help us continue to deliver quality journalism that holds leaders accountable. Your support of our work at any level is important. In return, we promise our coverage will be understandable, influential, vigilant, solution-oriented, and fair-minded. Together we can make a difference.

Share: 

Get alerts about this thread
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments