Moving to passive designs

The events at Fukushima Daiichi have greatly renewed the public focus on the safety of the existing fleet of nuclear reactors, especially as many US reactors share the same fundamental design—and safety systems—as the affected Japanese reactors. The authors explore the proposition that a transition to increasingly passive safety features in new advanced reactor designs— supplementing, and in some cases superseding, the existing approach of depending on active “defense-in-depth” safety systems—could significantly reduce reactor safety risks. Such passive safety features are highly developed in new small modular reactor designs now under thorough study, designs that may also markedly improve the economic case for nuclear power, based on a factory-built reactor approach. These reactors offer the possibility that US-based manufacturers could regain a significant share of the international nuclear reactor market.

RELATED:
RELATED: Bilateral strategic stability: What the United States should discuss with Russia. And China.

As the coronavirus crisis shows, we need science now more than ever.

The Bulletin elevates expert voices above the noise. But as an independent, nonprofit media organization, our operations depend on the support of readers like you. Help us continue to deliver quality journalism that holds leaders accountable. Your support of our work at any level is important. In return, we promise our coverage will be understandable, influential, vigilant, solution-oriented, and fair-minded. Together we can make a difference.

Share: 

Get alerts about this thread
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

ALSO IN THIS ISSUE

RELATED POSTS

Receive Email
Updates