The authoritative guide to ensuring science and technology make life on Earth better, not worse.
The best-known ad in the history of US politics—unless perhaps it's George H.W. Bush's infamous "Willie Horton" spot—has got to be Lyndon Johnson's still-startling 1964 ad called "Daisy Girl." The set-up is simple: A child no more than four years old plucks petals from a flower, counting up erratically ("…five, seven, six, six, eight…"). But before she gets a chance to try her luck with "ten," a man's booming voice intervenes, portentously counting down. As he reaches zero, the camera zooms tight to the little girl's eyeball. It reflects a vast and fiery nuclear detonation.
Message: Unless you'd like your children dead, you'd best not vote for Barry Goldwater.
Hillary Clinton's campaign now offers its own version of "Daisy Girl." No little children this time around. Instead, the ad juxtaposes the somber, anxious testimony of former launch control officer (and current research scholar at Princeton University's Program on Science and Global Security) Bruce Blair with intemperate statements on the hustings from Donald Trump.
Message: Unless you'd like your children dead, you'd best not vote for Donald Trump.
Whether the Blair ad has the political staying power of "Daisy Girl" won't be known until the second Tuesday in November and beyond.
Publication Name: Hillary Clinton 2016
To read what we're reading, click here
The Bulletin elevates expert voices above the noise. But as an independent nonprofit organization, our operations depend on the support of readers like you. Help us continue to deliver quality journalism that holds leaders accountable. Your support of our work at any level is important. In return, we promise our coverage will be understandable, influential, vigilant, solution-oriented, and fair-minded. Together we can make a difference.
Topics: Nuclear Weapons, What We’re Reading