The authoritative guide to ensuring science and technology make life on Earth better, not worse.
By John Mecklin | October 28, 2016
UN members voted lopsidedly on Thursday in favor of starting the process for negotiating a treaty that would outlaw nuclear weapons. The vote for the resolution tallied this way, according to the Guardian newpaper's account: 123 countries for, 38 opposed, and 16 abstaining. Many of the world's nuclear powers voted against the effort toward banning nuclear weapons; China, however, abstained, and North Korea voted for the resolution “to convene in 2017 a United Nations conference to negotiate a legally binding instrument to prohibit nuclear weapons, leading towards their total elimination.”
Over at the Huffington Post, Ploughshares Fund president Joe Cirincione provides a good summary of the UN vote and, though his sentiments in favor of the ban are obvious, notes the "real, honest debates among nuclear security experts on the pros and cons of this ban treaty." Other international news outlets also posted significant articles on the vote. If major national US news organizations had reports on Thursday's action—which the HuffPo headline accurately described as "historic"—they have evaded my efforts to find them.
Publication Name: Huffington Post
To read what we're reading, click here
The Bulletin elevates expert voices above the noise. But as an independent nonprofit organization, our operations depend on the support of readers like you. Help us continue to deliver quality journalism that holds leaders accountable. Your support of our work at any level is important. In return, we promise our coverage will be understandable, influential, vigilant, solution-oriented, and fair-minded. Together we can make a difference.
Topics: Nuclear Weapons, What We’re Reading