Image courtesy of Wolfgang Stemme/Pixabay
Nuclear energy: a distraction on the road to climate solutions
By Sharon Squassoni, November 15, 2021
Image courtesy of Wolfgang Stemme/Pixabay
Climate news has not been good this year. Extreme weather phenomena provided the backdrop for the August release of the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which warned that “[g]lobal warming of 1.5°C and 2°C will be exceeded during the 21st century unless deep reductions in CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions occur in the coming decades.” Keeping the rise in temperature to 1.5 degrees Celsius will require getting to net zero emissions by 2032. In short, more needs to happen, and happen quickly, to avoid the worst climate catastrophes.
Despite its low-carbon virtues, nuclear energy is anything but quick. In the race to net-zero emissions, nuclear energy remains at the starting line. Continuing to support nuclear energy at the expense of faster and cheaper alternatives for cutting greenhouse gas emissions is a losing strategy.
As the Russian invasion of Ukraine shows, nuclear threats are real, present, and dangerous
The Bulletin elevates expert voices above the noise. But as an independent, nonprofit media organization, our operations depend on the support of readers like you. Help us continue to deliver quality journalism that holds leaders accountable. Your support of our work at any level is important. In return, we promise our coverage will be understandable, influential, vigilant, solution-oriented, and fair-minded. Together we can make a difference.
Keywords: advanced reactors, climate change, climate crisis, global warming, nuclear energy, renewables, small modular reactors
Topics: Climate Change
Get alerts about this thread
0 Comments
Sharon Squassoni
Sharon Squassoni is research professor at the Institute for International Science and Technology Policy, Elliott School of International Affairs, at... Read More
