• About
  • Magazine
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Store
  • My Account
  • Login
  • Donate
Donate logo footer
logo footer
  • Doomsday Clock
  • Nuclear Risk
  • Climate Change
  • Disruptive Technologies
  • Biosecurity
A clock reading 89 seconds to midnight
A clock reading 90 seconds to midnight
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, with a clock reading 90 seconds to midnight
MENUMENU
  • Doomsday Clock
    • Overview
    • Doomsday Clock Statement
    • The Clock Setters
    • Timeline
    • FAQ
    • Virtual Tour
    • Doomsday Clock Playlist
  • Topics
    • Nuclear Risk
    • Climate Change
    • Disruptive Technologies
    • Biosecurity
    • Nuclear Notebook
    • What’s new at the Bulletin
  • Magazine
    • Login
    • Current Magazine Issue
    • Subscribe to the Magazine
    • My Account
    • Magazine Archive
    • Magazine FAQ
    • Magazine Covers
  • Support Our Work
    • Ways to Give
    • Annual Fund
    • Annual Event
    • Planned Gifts
    • Donor Recognition
    • Special Initiatives
    • Give Now
    • Store
  • About Us
    • Our Mission
    • Leadership
    • Staff
    • Events
    • Editorial Independence
    • Annual Report
    • Pathogens Project
    • Arts Science Initiative
    • Next Generation Initiative
    • Open Positions
  • Contact Us
    • Send us a Tip
    • Write for Us
    • Permissions & Copyright
    • Media Inquiries
    • Support Our Work
    • Advertise
    • Email Us
  • Stay Connected
    • Newsletter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Bluesky
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • YouTube

strategic arms control talks

What Trump got right about nuclear weapons—and how to step back from the brink

By Lucas Ruiz, Geoff Wilson | Nuclear Weapons, Opinion

Trump wants a nuclear deal. Can he be the ultimate negotiator?

By Jon B. Wolfsthal | Nuclear Weapons

The US and China re-engage on arms control. What may come next

By Daryl G. Kimball | Nuclear Weapons

US Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman and Russian deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov pose for pictures as they attend security talks on soaring tensions over Ukraine at the US permanent Mission, in Geneva, on January 10. "The conversation was difficult, it couldn't have been easy," Ryabkov was quoted as saying by the Interfax news agency after meeting Sherman during a working dinner in Geneva. (Photo by DENIS BALIBOUSE/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

Putin’s demand for security guarantees: Not new and not to be taken literally, but not to be ignored

By Andrey A. Baklitskiy | Analysis, Nuclear Risk

Don't miss an update

Subscribe to receive email updates
  • Doomsday Clock
  • Doomsday Clock Statement
  • The Clock Setters
  • Timeline
  • FAQ
  • Virtual Tour
  • Doomsday Clock Playlist
  • Topics
  • Nuclear Risk
  • Climate Change
  • Disruptive Technologies
  • Biosecurity
  • Nuclear Notebook
  • What’s new at the Bulletin
  • Magazine
  • Login
  • Current Magazine Issue
  • Subscribe to the Magazine
  • My Account
  • Magazine Archive
  • Magazine FAQ
  • Magazine Covers
  • Support Our Work
  • Ways to Give
  • Annual Fund
  • Annual Event
  • Planned Gifts
  • Donor Recognition
  • Special Initiatives
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Our Mission
  • Leadership
  • Staff
  • Events
  • Editorial Independence Policy
  • Annual Report
  • Pathogens Project
  • Arts Science Initiative
  • Next Generation Initiative
  • Open Positions
  • Contact Us
  • Send us a Tip
  • Write for Us
  • Permissions & Copyrights
  • Media Inquiries
  • Support Us
  • Advertise
  • Email Us
  • Stay Connected
  • Get Our Newsletter
  • Facebook
  • Bluesky
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2025 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. All rights reserved. Registered 501(c)(3). EIN: 36-2136497 Terms of UsePrivacy Policy

1307 East 60th Street, Chicago, IL 60637 | 773.834.3779