The authoritative guide to ensuring science and technology make life on Earth better, not worse.
By Dan Drollette Jr | August 4, 2016
An Wednesday, MSNBC host Joe Scarborough revealed that an unidentified foreign policy adviser had told him that, in a briefing about nuclear weapon, Donald Trump had repeatedly asked: “If we have them, why can’t we use them?”
His campaign denied this ever occurred.
But the kerfluffle does point up the fact that nuclear weapons are deployed in great numbers, at enormous cost, labor, time, and effort (and at tremendous risk), for the purpose of never being used.
Even if Trump never intended to draw attention to this contradiction.
As this New York Times article points out: "Such is the esoteric and at times puzzling logic of nuclear weapons that could lead a presidential candidate, even a very unusual one, to wonder at the point of weapons whose power comes in not being used."
Publication Name: New York Times
To read what we're reading, click here
The Bulletin elevates expert voices above the noise. But as an independent nonprofit organization, our operations depend on the support of readers like you. Help us continue to deliver quality journalism that holds leaders accountable. Your support of our work at any level is important. In return, we promise our coverage will be understandable, influential, vigilant, solution-oriented, and fair-minded. Together we can make a difference.
Topics: Nuclear Weapons, What We’re Reading