Does ‘net zero’ mean zero cows?

By John Lynch, Raymond Pierrehumbert | May 7, 2024

Cows have become such a part of the landscape that it can be hard to imagine some places—such as Switzerland—without them. Image courtesy of Simon Broccard, under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 license.

Does ‘net zero’ mean zero cows?

By John Lynch, Raymond Pierrehumbert | May 7, 2024


Allen, M.R., et al. 2022. “Net Zero: Science, Origins and Implications.” October. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 47, 849-887

Bryngelsson, D., et al. 2017. “How Do Dietary Choices Influence the Energy-System Cost of Stabilizing the Climate?” January 21. Energies. 10, 182

Clark, M.A., et al. 2020. “Global food system emissions could preclude achieving the 1.5° and 2°C climate change targets.” November 6. Science. 370, 705-708

Crippa, M., et al. 2021. “Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions.” March 8. Nature Food. 2, 198-209

Dutkiewicz, J. 2023. “Ireland isn’t culling cows for climate. But maybe it should be?” October 25. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2023 “Methane emissions in livestock and rice systems—Sources, quantification, mitigation and metrics.” Rome.

Friedlingstein et al. 2023. “Global Carbon Budget 2023.” December 6. Earth System Science Data. 15, 5301-5369.

Fuglestvedt, J., et al. 2018. “Implications of possible interpretations of ‘greenhouse gas balance’ in the Paris Agreement.” April 2. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A. 376, 20160445

Lynch, J., et al. 2021. “Agriculture’s Contribution to Climate Change and Role in Mitigation Is Distinct From Predominantly Fossil CO2-Emitting Sectors.” February 3. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 4:518039

McKenzie, J. 2023. “ ‘Mass delusion and wishful thinking’: Why everything you think you know about methane is probably wrong.” December 18. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.

Nisbet-Jones, P.B.R, et al. 2021. “Is the destruction or removal of atmospheric methane a worthwhile option?” December 6. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A. 380: 20210108

Pierrehumbert, R.T. 2014. “Short-Lived Climate Pollution.” May. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences. 42, 341-379

Pierrehumbert, R.T., and Eshel, G.  2015. “Climate impact of beef: an analysis considering multiple time scales and production methods without use of global warming potentials.” August 4. Environmental Research Letters 10, no. 8: 085002.

Reisinger, A. et al. 2021. “How necessary and feasible are reductions of methane emissions from livestock to support stringent temperature goals?” September 27. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A/ 379: 20200452

Smith, P., et al. 2019. “Land-Management Options for Greenhouse Gas Removal and Their Impacts on Ecosystem Services and the Sustainable Development Goals.” October. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 44, 255—286

Stuart-Smith, R.F., et al. 2023. “Legal limits to the use of CO2 removal.” November 16. Science. 16, 772—774

Többen, J.R., et al. 2022. “Global Land Use Impacts of Bioeconomy: An Econometric Input–Output Approach.” December 20. Sustainability. 14, 1976

Together, we make the world safer.

The Bulletin elevates expert voices above the noise. But as an independent nonprofit organization, our operations depend on the support of readers like you. Help us continue to deliver quality journalism that holds leaders accountable. Your support of our work at any level is important. In return, we promise our coverage will be understandable, influential, vigilant, solution-oriented, and fair-minded. Together we can make a difference.

Get alerts about this thread
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments