• About
  • Magazine
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Store
  • My Account
  • Login
  • Donate
Donate logo footer
logo footer
  • Doomsday Clock
  • Nuclear Risk
  • Climate Change
  • Disruptive Technologies
  • Biosecurity
A clock reading 89 seconds to midnight
A clock reading 90 seconds to midnight
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, with a clock reading 90 seconds to midnight
MENUMENU
  • Doomsday Clock
    • Overview
    • Doomsday Clock Statement
    • The Clock Setters
    • Timeline
    • FAQ
    • Virtual Tour
    • Doomsday Clock Playlist
  • Topics
    • Nuclear Risk
    • Climate Change
    • Disruptive Technologies
    • Biosecurity
    • Nuclear Notebook
    • What’s new at the Bulletin
  • Magazine
    • Login
    • Current Magazine Issue
    • Subscribe to the Magazine
    • My Account
    • Magazine Archive
    • Magazine FAQ
    • Magazine Covers
  • Support Our Work
    • Ways to Give
    • Annual Fund
    • Annual Event
    • Planned Gifts
    • Donor Recognition
    • Special Initiatives
    • Give Now
    • Store
  • About Us
    • Our Mission
    • Leadership
    • Staff
    • Events
    • Editorial Independence
    • Annual Report
    • Pathogens Project
    • Arts Science Initiative
    • Next Generation Initiative
    • Open Positions
  • Contact Us
    • Send us a Tip
    • Write for Us
    • Permissions & Copyright
    • Media Inquiries
    • Support Our Work
    • Advertise
    • Email Us
  • Stay Connected
    • Newsletter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Bluesky
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • YouTube

ballistic missile defense

Trump’s Iron Dome for America is ambitious. It also has some serious technology and policy flaws

By Stephen J. Cimbala, Lawrence J. Korb | Nuclear Weapons

The national missile defense fantasy—again

By Joe Cirincione | Nuclear Weapons, Opinion

In the first US “salvo” test of ground-based missile interceptors, two interceptors were launched from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California on March 25, 2019. They successfully intercepted a “threat-representative” ICBM target launched from a test site on Kwajalein Atoll in the Marshall Islands. This photo shows the launch of the “lead” interceptor, which destroyed the missile’s reentry vehicle. The “trail” interceptor struck the remaining “most lethal object” it could find. Credit: Missile Defense Agency

Bilateral strategic stability: What the United States should discuss with Russia. And China.

By Robert J. Goldston | Nuclear Weapons

Nike Zeus antiballistic missile system

Why does missile defense still enjoy bipartisan support in Congress?

By Subrata Ghoshroy | Missile Defense, Nuclear Risk

A SBIRS Geo satellite

“Big, fat, juicy targets”— the problem with existing early-warning satellites. And a solution.

By Jaganath Sankaran | Nuclear Risk, Opinion

A “Star Wars” sequel? The allure of directed energy for space weapons

By Jeff Hecht | Nuclear Weapons, Special Topics, Technology and Security

Arms control in outer space: The Russian angle, and a possible way forward

By Alexey Arbatov | Nuclear Weapons, Special Topics

Decoys as simple as balloons can often fool current missile defense systems.

Limitations on ballistic missile defense—past and possibly future

By George Lewis, Frank von Hippel | Analysis, Nuclear Risk, Nuclear Weapons

Russia’s underwater “doomsday drone”: Science fiction, but real danger

By Igor Sutyagin | Uncategorized

Saving nuclear arms control

By Alexei Arbatov | Uncategorized

How to approach nuclear modernization?: A Chinese response

By Lu Yin | Nuclear Weapons, Special Topics, Technology and Security

How to approach nuclear modernization?: A Russian response

By Eugene Miasnikov | Uncategorized

12

Don't miss an update

Subscribe to receive email updates
  • Doomsday Clock
  • Doomsday Clock Statement
  • The Clock Setters
  • Timeline
  • FAQ
  • Virtual Tour
  • Doomsday Clock Playlist
  • Topics
  • Nuclear Risk
  • Climate Change
  • Disruptive Technologies
  • Biosecurity
  • Nuclear Notebook
  • What’s new at the Bulletin
  • Magazine
  • Login
  • Current Magazine Issue
  • Subscribe to the Magazine
  • My Account
  • Magazine Archive
  • Magazine FAQ
  • Magazine Covers
  • Support Our Work
  • Ways to Give
  • Annual Fund
  • Annual Event
  • Planned Gifts
  • Donor Recognition
  • Special Initiatives
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Our Mission
  • Leadership
  • Staff
  • Events
  • Editorial Independence Policy
  • Annual Report
  • Pathogens Project
  • Arts Science Initiative
  • Next Generation Initiative
  • Open Positions
  • Contact Us
  • Send us a Tip
  • Write for Us
  • Permissions & Copyrights
  • Media Inquiries
  • Support Us
  • Advertise
  • Email Us
  • Stay Connected
  • Get Our Newsletter
  • Facebook
  • Bluesky
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2025 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. All rights reserved. Registered 501(c)(3). EIN: 36-2136497 Terms of UsePrivacy Policy

1307 East 60th Street, Chicago, IL 60637 | 773.834.3779