BEIR VII. 2006. Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII, Phase 2. 2006. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11340
Biddle, W. 1981. “Neutron Bomb: An Explosive Issue.” The New York Times Magazine. November 15. https://www.nytimes.com/1981/11/15/magazine/neutron-bomb-an-explosive-issue.html
Bird, K. and Sherwin, M. 2005. American Prometheus: The Triumph and Tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Clinton, W.J. 1995. Statement on a Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban. August 11. https://www.atomicarchive.com/resources/documents/deterrence/clinton-ctbt-1995.html
Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO). 2022. https://www.ctbto.org/sites/default/files/2023-10/2022_treaty_booklet_E.pdf
Funk, D.J. 2019. Enhanced Capabilities for Subcritical Experiments (ECSE): Portfolio Overview. March 11. Los Alamos National Laboratory. LA-UR-18-28253. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1468547/
General Advisory Committee. 1949. General Advisory Committee’s Majority and Minority Reports on Building the H-Bomb. October 30. https://www.atomicarchive.com/resources/documents/hydrogen/gac-report.html#Report
Harkin, T. and US Energy Department. 1999. “Senator Tom Harkin correspondence with the U.S. Department of Energy regarding the National Ignition Facility, Appendix B.” Reprinted in Nicole Deller, Arjun Makhijani, and John Burroughs, eds. Rule of Power or Rule of Law? 2003. New York: Apex Press. http://ieer.org/wp/wpcontent/uploads/2003/04/RuleofPowerorRuleofLaw2003.pdf
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 2023. IAEA World Fusion Outlook 2023. Fusion Energy: Present and Future. October. https://wwwpub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/FusionOutlook2023_web.pdf
Joint Chiefs of Staff Evaluation Board. 1947. “The evaluation of the atomic bomb as a military weapon.” The final report of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Evaluation Board for Operation Crossroads, Enclosure A. June 30. p. 34 and p.36. https://www.trumanlibrary.gov/library/research-files/evaluation-atomic-bomb-military-weapon?documentid=NA&pagenumber=1
Jones, S.L. and von Hippel, F.N. 1998. “The Question of Pure Fusion Weapons under the CTBT.” Science and Global Security, 7, 129-150.
Kirkpatrick, R.C., and Lindemuth, I. R. 1997. Magnetic Compression/ Magnetized Target Fusion (MAGO/MTF). LA-UR-97-4896. Los Alamos National Laboratory. March 10-14.
Kuznick, P. 2011. “Japan’s Nuclear History in Perspective: Eisenhower and Atoms for War and Peace.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. April 13. https://thebulletin.org/2011/04/japans-nuclear-history-in-perspective-eisenhower-and-atoms-for-war-and-peace-2/
Ma, T. 2024. TED talk. https://lasers.llnl.gov/news/llnls-tammy-ma-shares-fusion-energy-vision-ted
Max Born et al. 1955.The Einstein-Russell Manifesto. July 9. https://pugwash.org/1955/07/09/statement-manifesto/
Nuckolls, J. 1998. Early Steps towards Inertial Fusion Energy (1952 to 1962). Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, June 12.
Nuckolls, J. 2022. Speech at the 70th Anniversary of the Founding of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, September 8. Meeting video at minutes 38:40 to 39:55. https://livermorelabfoundation.org/2022/09/21/llf-news-70th-anniversary-reception-lab-director-panel-9-8-22/
Parker, C.B. 2016. “Cooperation of U.S., Russian scientists helped prevent nuclear catastrophe at the Cold War’s end, Stanford scholar says.” Stanford Report. June 16. https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2016/06/cooperation-u-s-russian-scientists-helped-avoid-nuclear-catastrophe-cold-wars-end-stanford-scholar-says
Sakharov, A. 1992. Memoirs. New York: Vintage Books, April.
Strauss, L. 1954. Remarks at The Founders’ Day Dinner, National Association of Science Writers. September 16.
Strauss, L. 1949. “Letter to President Harry S Truman.” November 25. https://www.atomicarchive.com/resources/documents/hydrogen/strauss.html
Sublette, C. 2023. “Complete List of All U.S. Nuclear Weapons.” Nuclear Weapon Archive. March 30. https://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/Weapons/Allbombs.html
Szöke, A. and Moir, R.W. 1991. “A Practical Route to Fusion Power.” Technology Review. July. pp. 21-27.
US Energy Department. 2022. “Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory achieves fusion ignition.” December 13. https://www.llnl.gov/article/49306/lawrence-livermore-national-laboratory-achieves-fusion-ignition
US Government, various agencies. 2016. “Quick Reference Guide: Radiation Risk Information for Responders Following a Nuclear Detonation.” December. https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Quick%20Reference%20Guide%20Final.pdf
Makhijani accuses the nuclear weapons labs of semi-secretly pursuing, or at least thinking about pure-fusion weapons. Yes, of course they are, and that activity is not secret. A pure-fusion weapon is undoubtedly a perpetual background objective of nuclear weapons labs worldwide. And why shouldn’t it be? They would be derelict in duty to their sponsors if they did not consider such possibilities. In any case a practical pure fusion weapon is not likely to come out of laser-driven fusion. It’s more likely to be developed with chemical high explosives, as postulated by Jones & von Hippel. So why not demand that all experimental work on chemical… Read more »
Or, how about removing War from the human tool kit entirely? Or perhaps there is no civilization on this small blue planet…
Ultra-small fusion weapons would have little or no practical advantages over conventional explosives. (See my previous comment.) The real concern of developing small fusion explosions is that if they become feasible to implement without fission primaries, then so will larger fusion explosives in the kiloton and megaton range. The essential ingredients are tritium and deuterium. If a fission primary is unnecessary, then tritium must be given the same safeguards status that Pu and HEU enjoy today. Even in today’s nuclear weapons, tritium in effect has the same importance as Pu or HEU, because virtually every weapon of all 9 nuclear powers is dependent… Read more »
Not mentioned is the fact that many of today’s thermonuclear weapons are three-staged devices. Much of their energy yield is derive from their fission third stage which also makes them extremely dirty due to the large quantities of radioactive fission products that result from their detonation. The secondary fusion stage is employed to generate neutrons that aid in the fission of a uranium shell. As I see it the quest for a pure fusion nuclear explosive has been driven more by a desire to justify the work in the face of public opposition.